How Tall are Frames usually or would that depend on the person running the game? I really love Wanzer sized mechs like 20 feet or so, but I also love Armored Core style mechs which this seems to be going for in terms of style.

This looks sick! Gonna try to get at least a one-shot game of it together asap.

I don't know if you care about lil typo-style feedback at this hour, but if so, there's a funny copy-paste oddity on p. 71: the Sword becomes an Energy weapon due to the MX-BEACON's signature feature, but it's still described as "A long, unpowered blade", emphasis mine 😅

Hi, its possible to have a community copies?

There's a few mentions of Integral Systems. I'm assuming these are Signature Systems, is this correct?

Thank you for the cool game.

I’ve been excited about Apocalypse Frame for a while.

Hi! I ain't the chance to read the updated 1.0.1 version, however, I'm curious: is this version a "fusion" of the 0.4.1 and the Ace High expansion? Or they are still two different documents, meant to stay divided?
Thanks in advance for the answer 💜

robot

About Drops.

They are mentioned several times, but we encounter the rule only at page 15, under GM Turn. I suggest to turn that part into a specific paragraph with its title (Drops, or something like that...).

Also, about the usage, and the meaning in fiction, let me ask if I'm getting them right. Let's say I defeat a couple of enemies (side note: defeat isn't a coded word, in the book, I suppose you could stay with Taken Out), both at Far distance. Then, it's GM turn: he activate his mecha, then at the end of his phase he rolls for the Drops. Are those Drops something not entirely rooted in fiction? Are those more meta-gamey? I mean, those Drops aren't located in the hex where I defeated the enemies, nor the Aces need to retrieve them, correct? Are they simply a sort of videogame bonus directly applied to the Aces that want them?

If this is the way, then you could add a little bit of details about their nature, and/or put an optional rule that root them more in fiction, ie. the Drops are described as real useful stuff really... dropping... on the battlefield by the wasted enemies, and the Aces at least need to move to that hex to retrieve/use them. Useful? Or maybe not in the spirit with the simple, low book-keeping, nature of the game? However, more info about them should be useful, imho.

PS: about the Ace Turn and GM Turn. I suggest to call them Aces Turn, and GM Turn. Also, while English isn't my mother language, I think that, at the start of GM Turn paragraph, page 15, this phrase could be explained better, or put it down in a different way: "After each Ace has taken their turn, the GM has one enemy Activation per Ace."
From what I understand, all the Aces does their turn (so, Aces Turn), then GM does. I'd put it as: "After that all the Aces has taken their turn, the GM has one enemy Activation per Ace." In the original description, I could take that "each" as: 1st Ace Turn, GM Turn, 2nd Ace Turn, GM Turn, 3rd Ace Turn, GM Turn etc. Am I the only one having that doubt, reading that phrase?

Hi Binary! (can't easily find your name, mr. Author 😉)
I'm reading the book, and I think I have issues with the "Move" term, and a particular paragraph:

So, we have "moves" that are "GM actions" (and, from what I understand, they are almost interchangeable with "GM enemy activations"). Then, the word Move is used also for the Move Move (!), that here I will call "Relocate", so there's no confusion about it (and, of course I humbly suggest you to find another term for the move-activation and/or for the move-move).

Said so, I read that I can activate a single enemy multiple times in my GM turn (and, of course, also as "reactive moves" from a Ace consequence). So, why to put the last part of the paragraph "The first time any given enemy is activated on the GM Ture, it may use two Moves instead of one"? I mean, if I want to make my enemy to do a couple of things in a single GM round, I could simply activate it two times (I can virtually do it infinite times). If, instead, you were meaning that with a single Move I can do 2x Relocate move, then of course it's a different thing, and in this latter case it's unclear from the paragraph.

So, in short: use different terms could be useful, AND, if I can activate infinite time an enemy, then it's redundant to specify I can do two moves with the first single one activation.

Thanks for the attention, and the eventual clarification. PS: I think you did a cool, pretty light, mecha-game; I love the exact amount of crunchiness you put in, and the usage of the tags. I hope it will stay fast at the table, I'd love to test it with my friends sooner or later. 

Andrea

God learning Roll20 and trying to do this at the same time is not recommended, would love to share this with my other TTRPG friends though!

When using hexes for combat, is there a limit to how many units can share a hex?

Hi! I think both 0.3.9 PDFs are spreads, could be wrong but can't make them into a single page

Probably I'm blind, but I can't find the Ace High file. Apparently, it seems included with the standard game, isn't it? 
I searched outside (here too: https://binarystar.games/docs/apocalypse-frame/aces-high/#expand-your-game ) but I can't find it.

I think your screenshots don’t have a white background and are just transparent because there’s a gray background on the screenshots (with the exception of the cover and the specifically white text on the “Background” and “Frame Overview” pages)

there's not much written about out of frame gameplay, how would combat work when not in a frame?

Is it possible to use the mechanics of this game for a different setting and beside another system that uses a d6? Planning to solo play this with a merc-type character.

Hi, I have a question.

In the combat example(p.16), the Ace has spent 2 Tension.

Why is his remaining Tension 0 point?